Archive for June, 2011

Dead Man Walking

Thursday, June 30th, 2011

By Erica Zaragoza

Is the moral conscience of a man compromised when he witnesses horrific brutality? Dead Man Walking, directed by Tim Robbins, portrays a profoundly resonant character in Sister Helen Prejean, played by Susan Sarandon, as she establishes a relationship with Michael Poncelet, played by Sean Penn, a man on death row. Prejean was a tangible angel who extended herself to the needs of a man desperate to impress his innocence on the world. However, as the story unfolds, this innocence is a mere fantasy he clings to in the hopes of being vindicated. Poncelet’s objective in contacting Sister Prejean is to have a representative file an appeal for him in order to stay his imminent execution. Prejean’s attempts at final appeals are denied, and thus Poncelet is a “dead man walking.” Poncelet eventually accepts culpability and his responsibility in the deaths of Hope Percy and Walter Delacroix, a young couple. Throughout the film, the monster that is initially depicted somehow warms the heart of the audience and becomes a beloved friend of Sister Prejean.

Poncelet’s licentious activities, coupled with his incendiary ideologies leave no room for empathy from the community or the victim’s parents. Poncelet is an amoral racist – proponent of Castro – self-proclaimed terrorist – arrogant chauvinist – and subscriber to Hitler’s beliefs. And yet, these demeaning qualities do little to deter the sympathy that pangs the audience after his execution.

The story begins with a characterization of Sister Prejean. Prejean is from an affluent family very supportive of her vocation. The fact that she comes from a stable home plays an integral part of her dedication to educating and instilling values in the lives of children from low income families. Sister Prejean is a beloved figure at Hope House and throughout the community. Michael Poncelet is not.

Their relationship begins when Poncelet contacts Sister Prejean by mail and requests a visit. Prejean obliges the request, but quickly questions why. Desperation is the immediate character trait Poncelet conveys. Desperate to prove to his mother he is innocent of murder. Desperate to file an appeal. Desperate to be accepted. Desperate to stand out. Desperate to no longer be a dead man walking. Most importantly desperate for Sister Prejean’s help.

During Poncelet’s tenure in prison he studied numerous law books, and compiled all the necessary paperwork to request a final appeal. All he needs now is a vehicle to deliver the request; this vehicle is Sister Prejean. Sister Prejean is asked to utilize the given information to hire counsel and present the case.

In death, when justice is done, do we vindicate those who have taken from us, and let people actually die with specks of dignity? It may never be known if Mr. Delacroix forgave Michael Poncelet in the moments before death stared him in the face, but as the story comes to a close and we see Mr. Delacroix at the funeral of Michael Poncelet it’s clear some sort of forgiveness is present. Walter Delacroix’s father experienced the death of his only son, a petition for divorce from his wife, and will continue to endure a lifetime of pain. Marriage vows rang true for the Delacroix’s…”till death do us part.” Mr. Delacroix finds solace in the resolve Sister Prejean finds in prayer, and so they pray. Together.

Hope Percy’s parents were much more reluctant to accept Sister Prejean, and Poncelet’s apology. Hope’s mother exclaimed to Sister Prejean “you don’t know when you see your child leave thru a door you’re never going to see them alive again.” At this time the Percy’s believed they were confiding in a trusted ally, not the spiritual advisor to their daughter’s killer. This became a paramount cornerstone in the relationship Sister Prejean is caught between. You can never have things both ways…befriending the animal and befriending the victims.

Then you have the Poncelet family. They have been ostracized from their communities as a consequence to their brother and son’s actions.

“A mother’s arms are strong when her child’s in danger.” The dynamic between Poncelet and his family is relatable, and humanized an inhumane character. His regard for his mother is genuine and sincere. We may never know if Michael Poncelet is vindicated from within, but when it’s all said and done he participated in his redemption and accepted accountability for his actions.

Dead Man Walking does an exceptional job angling the story of a murder. The movie spurred a capital punishment debate – profiled the pain of the victims’ families – explained the repercussions on those who are willing to help – depicted the pain of a mother watching as her son is executed – and sought to have justice done.

Dead Man Walking was nominated for four Academy Awards. Susan Sarandon won Best Actress for her portrayal of Sister Helen Prejean.

M

Wednesday, June 29th, 2011

By Chloe Sarnoff

Fritz Lang’s 1931 film, M, which was written by his wife, Thea von Harbou, is the story of a manhunt to find the criminal responsible for taking the lives of countless innocent children. M was Lang’s first film with sound and is also widely considered his most accomplished production. The film is supposedly based on the lives of notorious serial killers, Kurten, Grossman, Kurten, Denke and Haarman who terrorized Germany over the course of several decades. The police, who search to find their town’s killer, use the detective skills of the day, but also turn to the town’s other criminals for assistance in their quest for the culprit. M asks the audience to question the conventional concepts of who is in charge of ensuring that justice is upheld.  Especially when the good guys may need the bad guys help. M has been a major part of cinematic history and was even named #33 in Empire magazine’s “The 100 Best Films Of World Cinema” in 2010.”

The Career of Bob Balaban

Monday, June 27th, 2011

By Ben Falk

You’ve seen Bob Balaban, most people have. He has one of those faces that makes an impression. You may not know why it’s so familiar or why it’s a pleasant surprise, but you know it.

Balaban is everywhere. He portrays the characters that hold films together. Not background players, but those supporting parts that bring audiences into a film. These actors become their characters and transport the audience into a story. They are not stars, as they do not draw attention away from everything else. They are craftsmen, creating characters that serve the story and in turn, become a part of it. This is why you know Bob Balaban but cannot really place him. It’s a compliment. His type of acting marks the difference between a high school production and a run at the Old Vic. In high school it’s, “There’s Johnny playing a pirate;” with Balaban it’s, “there’s a pirate.”

While “pirate” may not have been a part played in one of Balaban’s many film or TV appearances, it very well could have been. In a 40-plus year career Balaban has performed in Midnight Cowboy; Catch-22; the TV-series Love, American Style; The Mod Squad (the boss 70’s version); Close Encounters of the Third Kind; Prince of the City; Absence of Malice; Miami Vice; Bob Roberts; Seinfeld; City Slickers II; The Late Shift; Waiting for Guffman; Deconstructing Harry; The West Wing; Gosford Park; A Mighty Wind; Capote; For Your Consideration; Entourage; Recount; Howl; and many, many more. Oh, and he’s also found time to direct: the HBO movie Bernard and Doris; produce: the Oscar-nominated Gosford Park; and write six children’s books about a bionic dog – who may or may not be the seal-team six dog sent in to kill Osama Bin Laden – named McGrowl.

It’s a varied, accomplished career. Filled with nominations, awards won, and even a few failures. But in the end it is clear: Balaban creates the characters we remember, if not the name of the person who played them.

Indiscretions. Repercussions. Men in Power.

Thursday, June 23rd, 2011

By Erica Zaragoza

Representative Anthony D. Weiner, a rising star of the Democratic Party, from New York, announced Thursday he would be resigning in the wake of his lewd photo scandal. The salacious activities that have enveloped men of power, on both sides of the isle, have left party leaders with no choice but to denounce personal behavior that negatively effects the reputation of the offices they hold. The moratorium on detrimental personal activities was meant to weed out the disingenuous and corrupt on Capitol Hill.

Being a constituent of Weiner, living only blocks away from his apartment, I had the opportunity to see both sides of the controversy surrounding the Congressman. Many members of my community were outraged that House Dem. leasers Nancy Pelosi and Debbie Wasserman Schultz made public statements urging Weiner to step down immediately. Many of his constituents believe Weiner has precipitated a series of positive changes for Queens and Brooklyn, and that he would continue to fight for those who elected him. The polarization that has subsequently ensued between those who think he should remain our Representative in Congress, and those who believe elected officials should compose themselves with proper decorum at all times caused the dichotomy that may have just ended Weiner’s political career–but is it salvageable?

Bill Clinton, Jim McGreevy, John Edwards, Eliot Spitzer, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Anthony Weiner…these names come to mind without more than a minute of reminiscing on political power houses who engaged in inappropriate relationships that jeopardized their family lives, and abused the offices they held. There is always a public apology followed by a request to respect the family’s privacy. I sincerely hope in the wake of this latest scandal our elected officials learn to respect the American people and serve our governement with integrity.

When Director of the Forum, Thane Rosenbaum, interviewed Eliot Spitzer at A Conversation with Eliot Spitzer, Spitzer referred to his indiscretions as “benching himself.” Well aware of the repercussions the urge just seems to be out of their control at times.

So, with the right counseling, private family time, and rehabilitation can these men regain their credibility with the American people? There was a time when unmarried politicians couldn’t make it big, or divorcee’s were unwelcomed on the political scene. Now people don’t think twice about how many times Newt Gingrich was married, so have we turned a new page in American society where men who betray our trust can be allowed back into the political arena? Gingrich later confessed that as he sat for the impeachment trial of Bill Clinton, he himself was being unfaithful to his wife. Are we more inclined as an educated electorate to forgive people who make mistakes, but hold an immediate public repentance?

At the Thursday news conference Weiner said, “I am announcing my resignation from Congress, so my colleagues can get back to work, my neighbors can choose a new representative and most important so that my wife and I can continue to heal from the damage I have caused.” How much more damage will be caused by powerful men who abuse their positions?

Only time will tell what happens to this embattled congressman.

Oliver Stone’s Tumultuous Relationship with Wall Street

Thursday, June 23rd, 2011

By Erica Zaragoza

Oliver Stone’s hauntingly accurate portrayal of the financial woes that epitomized corporate America in the 1980s in Wall Street was modernized for it’s sequel Wall Street 2, debuting in 2010. Wall Street. Stone’s experience on the subject stems from his adaptation of current events and public perception. Greed and power, the ideals that were idolized and glorified in the 1980s facilitated the impediments on Wall Street that founded the market crash and allowed runaway spending possible.

Stone’s Wall Street captured the populist view of the financial sector. Critically acclaimed for its depiction of Wall Street, Olive Stone does not exactly shy away from emoting his true feelings about the handlings of the market. At a meeting with Andrew Ross Sorkin, New York Times columnist and writer, Sorkin noted Mr. Stone saying “the mother of all evil” referring to an exiting Sanford Weill, former Chairman of Citigroup. There is an unwavering lust for money, power, and greed that Stone taps into in both the original and sequel of Wall Street.

Irritated by the idea that the government would enable the bad behavior of banks, Stone set out to expose the corruption.

From Sorkin’s interview with Stone:

“Look, Wall Street’s gone crazy. It’s banking on steroids.” “Banks don’t mean what they did. When I was a kid, you had a savings account; you made 3 to 4 percent. Now you make zero, and Goldman Sachs is a bank holding company.”

Many see Oliver Stone’s representations radical and over dramatic. He is the son of a broker, his father ironically worked under Sanford Weill, and understands that when trust is lost you lose credibility in the market. Stone recognizes an oversimplification stating Wall Street is evil would make him seem radical, and yet, he stands firm in his depiction that evil, greed, and power hungry mongrels do exist and subsist in the financial sector.

Fritz Lang

Wednesday, June 22nd, 2011

By Chloe Sarnoff

Fritz Lang was born in Vienna, Austria in 1890.  As a young man, he trained as a painter and even studied painting in Paris during the years he spent traveling Europe, Asia and North Africa.  At the age of 25, Lang returned home to Vienna and enlisted in the army.  However, soon after joining the war effort, he was badly injured.  During his recovery, he began to toy around with the idea of writing scripts for films. When his injuries proved too severe to continue fighting, Lang experimented with acting at a local theater in Vienna.  He was then offered a position at a production company in Berlin.  Not long after arriving in Germany, Lang married a writer and actress named Thea von Harbou. Together, the pair wrote and directed some of Lang’s most famous films: Dr. Mabuse: The Gambler, Siegfried, Metropolis and M. M depicted the crimes of a serial killer whose main targets were  children of Berlin. The movie is said to have become a tremendous influence on the work of  Michael Powell, Alfred Hitchcock and Jacques Tourneur. M’s success ultimately led a Nazi propaganda minister to offer Lang the position of the head of The German Cinema Institute.  Lang refused the offer and fled Germany for Paris.  In the 1930’s, Lang immigrated to the United States under a contract with MGM.  For the next 20 years, Lang worked on numerous American films before finally returning to Germany.

The Case of the Loopy Lawyers — Frat-party antics and self-doubt are the stuff of today’s legal dramas; where’s Atticus Finch?

Monday, June 20th, 2011

Forum Director, Thane Rosenbaum wrote an article for The Wall Street Journal on TNT’s new show Franklin & Bash.

In “Franklin & Bash,” which premiered this month on TNT, two debauched playboys join a tony law firm and introduce their new colleagues to the joys of hot tubs and karaoke. “Harry’s Law,” which just finished its first season on NBC, features a zany, pistol-packing Kathy Bates, who starts her own criminal defense law firm. In “Suits,” which debuts next week on USA, a guy without a college or law degree successfully masquerades as an attorney.

To read more, click here.

“Daniel”: A Reminder

Monday, June 20th, 2011

By Ben Falk

Daniel is Sidney Lumet’s 1983 film about a couple who are, we are led to believe, unjustly accused, tried, sentenced, and executed for passing state secrets to the Soviet Union. Based on E.L. Doctorow’s novel, The Book of Daniel”, it is essentially the story of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, the real life couple who, according to many, were unjustly accused, tried, sentenced, and executed for passing state secrets to the Soviet Union. Now, I don’t know much about the Rosenberg Trial and I have no opinion on their guilt or innocence, except to say that whatever did happen – their arrest, trial, appeals, and execution – could have been done better. Lumet and Doctorow seem to agree.

Neither Lumet nor Doctorow (who wrote the novel and screenplay), definitively answer whether Paul and Rochelle Isaacson, their stand-ins for Julius and Ethel, are guilty of spying for the Soviets or not. What they do explain is that whatever happened to the Isaacsons was not justice. Why? Because the Isaacsons’ guilt or innocence is beside the point, what happened to them was not justice but a deadly form of irrational exuberance.

Americans were petrified. It was the start of the cold war and the U.S. had an ace in the hole: the bomb. Then one day, we didn’t. The thing we used to assure ourselves that another world war was never going to happen, the weapon we possessed in order to guarantee that the Soviet Union would never do to us what it was doing to small, eastern European countries, was now in Soviet hands. This was too much to handle.  There was mass hysteria and we were looking for someone to blame. Someone needed to be punished for the USSR building a bomb and for better or worse, the Rosenberg’s had to pay for the U.S.’s failure to protect its most vital military asset.

For a brief moment, in the search for someone to blame, for sacrificial lambs to act as a national catharsis, Americans forgot what made us better than the Soviets: our capacity to always seek truth, and our dedication to justice and what is right. That is the point that “Daniel” seems to be making. Lumet is reminding us that our ideals are slippery, if we do not hold on tight and be mindful of our actions we could lose what makes us who we are. “Daniel” is a reminder. It reminds us of what can happen when we allow hysteria to overtake reason.

Michael and Robert Meeropol

Thursday, June 16th, 2011

By Chloe Sarnoff

Michael and Robert Meeropol are the sons of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg.  The Rosenberg’s were members of the Communist party, who were arrested and executed for conspiracy to commit espionage during the Red Scare of the 1950’s.  In 1957, the young boys were legally adopted by Abel Meeropol, a writer, and his wife Anne, and assumed their adopted parents’ last name.  Michael attended Swarthmore College and also received graduate degrees from Cambridge University in England, and the University of Wisconsin; Robert attended the University of Michigan as an undergraduate and graduate student and received a law degree from the Western New England College School of Law.

As a young man, Robert became an active member of the anti-war movement, as well as a college anthropology professor, and in 1980, he became the managing editor of The Socialist Review. Michael began his career as an economist and wrote a book about the Clinton and Reagan administrations.  Together, Michael and Robert sued the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. under the Freedom of Information Act, and were awarded access to 300,000 previously confidential documents that dealt with their parents’ case. The two brothers believed that these documents proved that their parents were innocent of the crimes for which they had been imprisoned and executed.  They collaborated and co-authored several books about their lives and their parents’ case.  During the 1970’s, the brothers publicly identified themselves as the children of Ethel and Julius Rosenberg when they published The Rosenberg Letters, which was the first complete and unedited set of letters written by the Rosenberg’s during their time in jail, as well as We Are Your Sons, which discussed their parents’ trials and legacies.  The Rosenberg case is thought to be the main inspiration for E. L. Doctorow’s novel, The Book of Daniel, as well as the film Daniel, directed by Sidney Lumet.

Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps

Monday, June 13th, 2011

By Erica Zaragoza

Affluence is the malignant disease that quietly metastasizes into an overwhelming desire to need, want, got to have more. Money, power, and greed are all simple enough concepts that most people are able to control, maintain, and incorporate into their daily lives. However, when money, power, and greed envelop the soul of the man, chaos is bound to ensue.

The opening scene of Oliver Stone’s Wall Street: Money Never Sleeps gives us a glimpse into the world of Gordon Gekko, played by Michael Douglas, whose life was turned upside down when he was incarcerated. Exposed is the world he left, the technological advancements he missed, but also, all the things that haven’t changed, including most particularly his estrangement from his only daughter. Leaving jail, Gekko witnesses a father being welcomed home by his small children, which quickly foreshadows the turbulent family life that will unfold throughout the story; the resentment, the anger, and the lack of trust. Winnie Gekko, played by Carey Mulligan the devastated daughter, has moved on from her father’s indiscretions and sought out a life that does not include any ties to her Gekko roots. She does so because she believes that the activities that precipitated her father’s arrest were the root cause of her brother’s suicide, and thus have wedged a serious divide within the family.

Winnie finds solace in the new life she establishes with her boyfriend Jacob. Ironically, Jacob, played by Shia Lebouf, is a wall-street type who also has a complicated relationship with money. As seen in the monetizing of ideas, the cashing in on promises and the granting fraudulent bonuses, it is extremely apparent that money is the key component dictating the relationships that exist.

As the story unfolds, Jacob, the wall-street prodigy, becomes an embattled servant to the dollar. He constantly tries to remain above its influence, and to distance himself from the archetype Winnie despises. He falls short of the mark when he decides to trust his future father-in-law after his mentor Louis Zabel commits suicide. Zabel’s suicide culminates amidst growing pressure from the financial sector for his company to declare bankruptcy.  Gekko understands the dealings of Wall Street and thus a relationship between Jake and Gordon emerges. Jake goes behind Winnie’s back and forges a relationship with Gordon that eventually divides Winnie and Jake, and shows the true colors of Gordon Gekko, as well as that  deception and greed always die hard.

MELTDOWN.

The backdrop to the Gekko  family dynamic is the financial crisis that ensued when the housing market collapsed.

Undervalued — overvalued. The recurring theme of estimations gone awry creates a dichotomy between those who have confidence in the market and those who have lost it. Louis Zabel’s suicide epitomizes those who lost confidence. Zabel’s suicide also served as the catalyst for Jacob’s unnerving obsession with attaining power and avenging the death of his mentor.

The deliberations and negotiations of mistakes made by Wall Street serve as the cornerstone of financial impediments to Main Street. Gordon Gekko is keenly aware of the intricacies of the market and  of greed, and is a master of manipulation. He uses his this  power to swindle Winnie’s money from her.

When Gordon steals from Winnie, it becomes apparent just  how greedy he really is. Jake proceeds to find Gordon to tell him the news that he will have a grandson, and that because of the trust he placed in Gordon, Winnie wants nothing to do with him. Gekko’s cold demeanor and compromised moral compass begin to thaw and become rehabilitated at the sight of the ultrasound. Eventually, Gekko returns to congratulate Winnie and return the money in the form of a trust account for the baby. This culminates in the reunion of Jake and Winnie, and the beginning of a renaissance for the Gekko family.