<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Does Moral Justice Trump Professional Responsibility?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.forumonlawcultureandsociety.org/blog/2013/02/12/when-does-moral-justice-trump-professional-responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.forumonlawcultureandsociety.org/blog/2013/02/12/when-does-moral-justice-trump-professional-responsibility/</link>
	<description>Connect on how legal matters affect society and influence the artistic imagination</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:31:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CP</title>
		<link>http://www.forumonlawcultureandsociety.org/blog/2013/02/12/when-does-moral-justice-trump-professional-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77260</link>
		<dc:creator>CP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 02:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forumonlawcultureandsociety.org/blog/?p=3544#comment-77260</guid>
		<description>The buried bodies case was interesting for a variety of reasons. One being that it illustrates the extreme circumstances in which lawyers ethically must keep their clients&#039; disgusting, immoral, despicable, and yes, immoral secrets. However, I think the most interesting part is that the lawyers actually leveraged the privileged information they had about where the bodies where buried in a negotiated plea deal. They were certainly not ethically required to do that. THAT is disgusting. 

The rules of professional ethics do not dictate that we be hired guns for our clients. We can choose whether or not we want to practice that way. The rules allow us to choose how moral we choose to be in our profession.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The buried bodies case was interesting for a variety of reasons. One being that it illustrates the extreme circumstances in which lawyers ethically must keep their clients&#8217; disgusting, immoral, despicable, and yes, immoral secrets. However, I think the most interesting part is that the lawyers actually leveraged the privileged information they had about where the bodies where buried in a negotiated plea deal. They were certainly not ethically required to do that. THAT is disgusting. </p>
<p>The rules of professional ethics do not dictate that we be hired guns for our clients. We can choose whether or not we want to practice that way. The rules allow us to choose how moral we choose to be in our profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.forumonlawcultureandsociety.org @ 2013-05-24 19:18:55 -->

<!-- W3 Total Cache: Page cache debug info:
Engine:             disk: basic
Cache key:          w3tc_www.forumonlawcultureandsociety.org_1_page_d6bf2648aafb9f9f60807dfa9ea5a3fd
Caching:            disabled
Reject reason:      Page is feed
Status:             not cached
Creation Time:      0.292s
Header info:
X-Pingback:         http://www.forumonlawcultureandsociety.org/blog/xmlrpc.php
Last-Modified:      Mon, 13 May 2013 21:31:21 GMT
ETag:               "8e60e2c60c5b4f78b5b578cbd28afb70"
X-Powered-By:       W3 Total Cache/0.9.2.5b
Link:               <http://www.forumonlawcultureandsociety.org/blog/?p=3544>; rel=shortlink
Content-Type:       text/xml; charset=UTF-8
-->